With the takeover of AIG, the federal government has wangled its fourth major bailout and taken control of its very first insurance company.
Both McCain and Obama have called the bailouts of AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Bear Stearns “necessary measures.” McCain blames greedy Wall Street tycoons while Obama blames failed GOP policies.
Most sensible folks agree that the government’s implicit guarantee to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were a license to lenders to run rampant. Fannie and Freddie were able to buy bundles of home mortgages and/or mortgage-backed securities in massive quantities without contemplation of the financial risks.
Some economists blame the regulators/regulations. I disagree. The financial industry is heavily regulated. It was the government’s guarantee of Fannie and Freddie that emboldened lenders to put together dicey loans and encouraged undisciplined financial endeavors.
Government policy laid the foundation of the mortgage crisis more than three decades ago when Congress passed the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. The law forced banks to loan money to low-income borrowers in order to meet the “needs” of the local community.
No worries, though. The banks knew they could sell off those loans to Fannie or Freddie, and F & F knew they could buy those loans with little regard for the risk.
I’m reminded of the past weekend here in Las Vegas when a few enthusiastic friends (first time visitors) went out and hit the blackjack tables.
A young man playing two hands was dealt four sevens. A friend advised him to split and play four hands. Pondering the risks, he hesitated – but the helpful friend offered to cover his losses and let him keep all the chips if he won.
What do you suppose that young man did?
He behaved as anyone would: he played all four sevens. And, unfortunately, lost on all.
So it goes on the tables of Sin City. So too, in Congressional corridors and bank board rooms.
Tags: AIG, bailouts, Bear Stearns, blackjack, borrowers, Community Reinvestment Act, Congress, double down, Fannie, Freddie, Government, Las Vegas, lenders, low-income, mortgages, necessary measures, risks, securities, Wall Street
The Hill is reporting that the Senate just passed the 2008 Fannie & Freddie Prop Up bill (72-13). The monster housing bill will now go to the White House for W’s Johnny Hancock. For what it’s worth, all 13 ’no’ votes were GOP-ers. Senator DeMint (R-SC) had delayed the bill over objections to F & F lobby rights, but in the end the R’s struck a deal with the Dems and passed it.
The bill will allow re-fi’s of up to $300 billion in distressed mortgages, give tax breaks galore in order to help the market, tighten future oversight of F & F – and (this is the real kicker) give the Treasury temporary authority to approve an unlimited line of credit for F & F. Now isn’t that sweet?! We, the taxpayers, are going to foot the bill for a bottomless pile of cash for two government-sponsored enterprises being run by people of questionable judgment.
If you wish to see this in a positive light, just read the first paragraph of today’s Washington Post story which says, “In a rare weekend session, the Senate today ended months of legislative wrangling and gave final approval to a sprawling housing bill that seeks to halt the steepest slide in home prices in a generation, rescue hundreds of thousands of families from foreclosure and restore confidence in the nation’s largest mortgage finance firms.”
(GAG!!)
Why-oh-why is it the job of Congress to interfere with the natural forces of the market, rescue people from foreclosure because they financed over-priced houses with adjusable-rate mortgages they now cannot afford, and restore confidence in two companies that probably deserve to fail due to poor management? Where in the Constitution does it say that the State is responsible for protecting its citizens from the natural consequences of their own poor judgment?!!
The Nanny State gets fatter while our dependence upon her grows…


Tags: Congress, DeMint, dependence, Fannie, foreclosure, Freddie, Housing Bill, lobby rights, market, mortgages, Nanny State, rescue, Senate, tax breaks, unlimited line of credit, Washington Post