meeting

Clark County GOP Censures Legislators Who Voted for Tax Increases

Posted by E!! on June 10, 2009
GOP, Government Spending, Nevada, Taxation / 8 Comments

I was unable to attend, but Chuck Muth gives us the details of the special meeting of the Clark County Republican Central Committee last night.  We agreed in advance it would probably be a circus.  But Chuck says it was all business:  ”serious, thoughtful and orderly.”

The main purpose of the controversial meeting was to consider and vote on a resolution censuring the Republican state legislators who voted for this session’s higher taxes. Here’s the text of the resolution:

Whereas, Clark County, Nevada is already burdened with high unemployment and a sagging business economy; and,

Whereas, the platform of the Clark County Republican Party is clear in its opposition to new taxes; and,

Whereas, raising taxes is extremely poor public policy for Nevada’s people and it’s economy; and,

Whereas, the Nevada Republican Party as a whole, and every Chairman of every Nevada County Central Committee has signed a resolution urging it’s elected legislators to vote against raising new taxes; and,

Whereas, the political damage caused to the Republican Party brand name from Republican officeholders who support higher taxes is tremendous; and,

Whereas the Clark County, Nevada Republican Party has a responsibility to make it clear that individual legislators who are registered as Republicans who voted for tax increases did so in disregard for and in opposition to their own political party; therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED by the Clark County, Nevada Republican Party that for their votes in support of raising taxes in SB 429, we censure the following registered Republican legislators:

Republican Senators:
Dennis Nolan
Warren Hardy
William Raggio
Dean Rhoads
Randolph Townsend

Republican Assemblymen:
John Carpenter

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the members of the Clark County Nevada Republican Party urge the Republican Party Central Committee, or any other official party entity from giving any assistance of any kind to those legislators listed above.

Chuck said a few people spoke against the resolution, on the grounds that it would hurt the party to appear fractured. But those speaking in favor pointed out that the harm done to the party by Republican legislators voting for this tax hike was far more harmful - and that something had to be said about it.

The resolution passed OVERWHELMINGLY. Says Chuck:  “The “yeas” were thunderous; the “nays” were barely audible whispers.”

And so it is that the party folks in Clark County took a major step toward reclaiming the GOP from the ”moderate” legislative leadership.

May all Nevada’s other counties follow suit.  So let it be written, so let it be done.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

How Many Commissioners Does It Take…

Posted by E!! on August 12, 2008
Blogs of Nevada, Clark County, Government Spending / No Comments

Question:  How many years does it take a group of Clark County Commissioners to decide to open a finished beltway interchange for public use?

Answer:  Two.

Read about it here.  Hopefully common sense will win out at the August 19 meeting.  Contact your commissioner before then if you give a hoot.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Nance Quits, Saves Public the Trouble of Ousting Him

Posted by E!! on August 11, 2008
Blogs of Nevada / No Comments

Well, as sometimes happens in politics, the story changes while a draft is sitting and waiting for more information.  Such is the case today with the resignation of Greg Nance, Nevada’s District 5 DOE Board member, in the aftermath of his ridiculous antics and highly improper behavior at this weekend’s Board meeting.

In preparation for making the details public and providing contact information for complaints from the public, I had interviewed acting Board President Ruggiero, emailed one other Board member, and was waiting on a call back from the DOE Ethics panel.  In lieu of that and since Nance is now gone (thank goodness!) here some excerpted lowlights from the LVRJ article about his behavior:

“…Nevada Board of Education member Greg Nance dangled a piece of jewelry in the face of his newlywed wife, ringing a tiny bell on a bracelet as she giggled

The distraction caused fellow board member Cindy Reid to call for an immediate halt to Saturday’s video-conference of the state Board of Education…  “I don’t know what to say,” Reid said from a conference room on East Sahara Avenue in Las Vegas. “I’m embarrassed the public has to watch this. This is so inappropriate.”

Nance, who represents District 5, was unapologetic. I will entertain my wife. I love my wife,” he said, adding that he was only answerable to the members of his Las Vegas district.  Bill Irvin, a deputy attorney general who advises the board, urged Nance to follow decorum.

Nance responded that there was no law saying his wife could not sit next to him at board meetings. “Therefore, bite me!” Nance told the attorney. 

Vice President Anthony Ruggiero, who was acting president for the absent President Marcia Washington, advised members of the public to file complaints and continued the meeting.

During a break, Nance, 49, told the Review-Journal that he married the 20-year-old woman 12 days ago. She has cerebral palsy and came to the meeting in a motorized wheelchair.  He said “too much partying and rock ‘n’ roll” over his honeymoon explained why he could not always stay awake or hear what was going on.

Because he was dozing during one policy discussion, Reid demanded that he take back his vote on his issue. The board agreed with Reid, but the issue passed by a wide margin anyway.”

I didn’t begrudge Nance his fair share of happiness with a wife 29 years his junior and who apparently had nothing better to do than sit by his side while he slept through DOE Board meetings.  But her presence at the conference table, Nance’s open flirting, Nance’s invitation to Ruggerio to “bite me,” and Nance falling asleep during discussions and voting were improper, ill-mannered, and just totally unacceptable. 

I was going to say Nance should be sanctioned or removed.  Nevada is already a political laughing stock in many ways and has more than enough clowns to go around.  Thankfully, Nance agreed.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,