Posted by E!!
on March 25, 2009
Uncategorized /
No Comments
Vin Suprynowicz has a good piece on a new lawsuit just brought before the Nevada Supreme Court by Las Vegas attorney Phil Aurbach. The contention is that pharmacists had a duty to voice their concerns to doctors before filling a prescription for a narcotic painkiller for a woman who later killed someone in a car crash (in Vegas in 2004).
Aurbach says Nevada pharmacists continued to fill prescriptions for Patricia Copening even after warnings by a state task force that she might be a prescription drug abuser. He asked the court to reinstate the wrongful death case he seeks to file against several pharmacies.
District Judge Douglas Herndon earlier threw out the case, saying the pharmacies were not legally liable in the crash. Vin concurs and says you can’t hold pharmacists responsible for following doctors’ orders, nor for what people do with the pills they’re given. I agree.
I do think the sentences for people who commit crimes while abusing prescription pills should be much harsher, though. The lady from this story got only NINE MONTHS in jail after killing someone while all doped up. That sentence seems more appropriate for non-negligent manslaughter, not for someone who chose to drive after popping pills that say “Warning: May cause drowsiness. Do not operate heavy machinery” on the side of the bottle.
Tags: Copening, lawsuit, Nevada, pharmacies, Phil Aurbach, wrongful death suit
A Vegas voter posted this on Bob Beers’ blog yesterday:
Disgusted with Dems Says:
October 31st, 2008 at 3:01 pm
I went to one of the early voting locations today and when I refused the Copening propaganda her supporters thrust at me in the parking lot, I was called a “b*tch” as I walked away. How dare they treat voters with such disrespect.
In this next case, emailed in by my one of my readers, a partisan person was sanctioned:
I voted this morning at the Lake Meade/Tenaya location. Probably the most excitement was a guy from the Obama campaign that had on a yellow T-shirt that said “voting questions – ask me” or something like that. He was sitting along the line of people waiting to vote.
I didn’t think anything of it, until I noticed that all the poll workers had on blue/white/red shirts. About that time, the guy was escorted out of the area. He took off the shirt and then was milling around with the ‘poll observers’. I was ready to grab my cell phone for a picture if anything exciting happened, but nothing did.
I waited about an hour to vote. My hubby was on Channel 3 – they were interviewing people about the early voting process – was it easy, what did we think, etc.
There is not supposed to be any partisan canvassing at the polls. Also, in re: to situation 1 above, here is what item 3 of the Nevada Voters’ Bill of Rights, as outlined in NRS 293.2546, says about voting:
3. Each voter has the right to vote without being intimidated, threatened or coerced.
That first voter should have complained to the poll workers so they could have asked those Copening people to take their handouts and nasty remarks elsewhere.
Tags: Beers, campaigning, canvassing, Copening, early voting, Las Vegas, McCain, Nevada, Obama, partisan, polls, rules, where can I vote in Las Vegas
If you are a District 6 voter, or just interested in looking in on one of Nevada’s hotly contested state senate races, be sure to see this E!! exclusive “mock debate” featuring a Q & A with incumbent Senator Bob Beers and Democrat candidate Allison Copening.
Copening has been widely criticized for refusing to debate Senator Beers after an initial appearance on Face to Face early in the political season. Producer Dana Gentry made no bones about her views on the matter, snarking about ”political candidates who are woefully unprepared for the office to which they aspire” and “even worse…who put their name on the ballot and then disappear, refusing to address the very citizens they hope to represent.
E!! is therefore delighted to be able to present a “mock debate” in which Senator Beers and Ms. Copening will be answering a series of questions pertaining to public policy in Nevada. Both candidates were given identical sets of questions, and both returned their answers to me without seeing their opponent’s responses.
Enjoy ~ and please feel free to contact me with questions or leave your comments below.
Tags: Beers, Copening, debate, Nevada, positions, Senate, state