commentary
Balanced Budgets, Barack Obama, Fleecing the Taxpayers, Taxation / 2 Comments
I keep reading commentary, even in respected conservative forums, that Paulson’s gigantic bailout plan is bad, and admittedly un-conservative, but that we must do “something” and the alternative is too dreadful to contemplate.
As Colonel Potter used to say, “Horse-hockey!”
Protecting the long-term value of the American dollar is more important than a quick fix. So is teaching our bankers, traders and lawmakers that the government is not going to bail them out of future messes. If there’s a pot of government gold at the end of every financial rainbow, what’s to stop everyone from chasing the green leprechaun again?
Federal action is warranted, but the focus should be less on debt and more on protecting present and future capital. If we go about this rationally and take this opportunity to promote pro-growth policies and tax reform, investors will respond to the prospect of higher future returns. It’s that simple.
Conservatives: we cannot abandon our principles in times of crisis. We must remain steady at the wheel.
Days after the cessation of the Conservative Leadership Conference 2008, remembrances float up…
…Seton Motley’s talk on Media Bias and the unFairness Doctrine (sponsored by the Media Research Center)…clip after clip of such biased “reporting” (commentary and emoting) that one is heartily laughing and throughly appalled all at once…
…Chris Matthews (MSNBC), Keith Olbermann (ditto), Brian Williams (NBC), Ann Curry (ditto), John Roberts (CNN), Campbell Brown (ditto), Charlie Gibson (ABC), Terry Moran (ditto) and more…
…the observation that some so-called journalists and major media outlets are now eschewing ratings and “sacrificing the bottom line to ideology”…sacrificing viewers (do they say “good riddance”?) in order to push their increasingly obvious agenda…
…the concept of Bias by Omission (what is not reported that should be)…
…the three upcoming vacancies on the FCC (February) and who will seat them (McCain or Obama) and do the vetting…
…the new “code words” for the Fairness Doctrine that are springing up in activist organizations posing as non-partisan groups: “localism,” “media democracy,” “media reform,” “universal access”…which you can see in action here…
…the effect the Fairness Doctrine (and other limits on media) would likely have: the mass migration of conservative talk radio personalities to satellite radio, increased internet podcasting, vlogging (blogging via video clips), and other New Media forums/outlets…
…a comment by a young mother in attendance that Nickolodeon attempts political indoctrination of children via their “kid reporters” (who covered the DNC, but not the RNC)…
2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Uncategorized / No Comments
Well, I’ve listened to an hour+ of commentary and been on a dozen blogs and no one is mentioning the thing that (to me) stood out most in Michelle Obama’s speech: she started at least a dozen sentences with the word “See…” to the point that the repetition became a distraction and annoyance.
I took it this way: ”See, it’s like this” and “See, let me tell you how” and “See, this is what you have to understand.” As she delivered her lines, she was just shy of being vein-poppingly earnest. Which is to say, she wasn’t quite convincing except in her obvious desire to make us See what she thinks we need to See in order to put she and her husband in the White House.
Coupled with the finger pointing and subtle head-bobbing which both increased as the moments ticked on (go back to the video and watch for it) I couldn’t help but think, “You can take the girl out of the South Side, but you can’t take the South Side out of the girl.”
No soft dress, salon-styled hair, and suave speech writer can make Michelle Obama other than what she is: an overtly proud and condescending woman with an attitude a mile high.




