Senior Administration Officials Utter Orwellspeak On Health Care

Posted by E!! on July 26, 2009
health care

This NY Post health care op-ed includes some truly appalling commentary by Dr. Ezekiel (Rahm’s brother) Emanuel and Dr. David Blumenthal.

As I was reading the piece I had a wrenching, visceral reaction.  Orwellian in nature.

These people actually believe they are adequately equipped to make not only “minor” but also life-and-death health care decisions for the elderly, the infirm, and the terminal.  That they have the right to say when a person does, or does not, need or deserve health care – and to what degree.  That they can and should decide which technologies are “appropriate” and which are too costly depending on the age and condition of the patient.

They knowingly and deliberately wish to suppress and subvert the will of family, and of the individual.  And they do it in the name of money:  cost savings, greater efficiencies.

It is horrifying.  Because the only thing more agonizing and torturous than having to make a life-or-death and/or quality-of-life choice about the care of a loved one, or yourself, is to be taken out of the process and have some computer algorithm or committee make the decision for you.

If these monsters are allowed to proceed — what else do you call men so misguided and monomaniacal that they sit in their mahogany-trimmed offices and play at being gods with clear conscience? — we will find ourselves living that horrifying vision that was once but a fiction.

(As an aside, Orwell’s heirs should sue Emanuel, Blumenthal, President Obama, and two-thirds of Congress for copyright infringement over health care language.)

And we should all come out of our slumber before we find ourselves in a nightmare from which we cannot wake.

Update: Fred Thompson interviews the writer of the above-named NY Post piece, Betsy McCaughey (8 minutes).

She said that on page 425 of the House bill is language making it mandatory that every five years, people in Medicare will have a required counseling session that will educate them about how to end their life sooner (how to refuse nutrition and medication, and how to approach hospice care).  And that some parts of the bill dictate that the elderly will be faced with denials of care based on their age.  It’s called “comparative effectiveness.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments to Senior Administration Officials Utter Orwellspeak On Health Care

Steven Dexter
26 July 2009

Whenever I point out to my leftist friends that this program (and all the others that have been forced upon us the past few months) has never ever worked in the history of civilizaton…that it always always always leads to depressions, oppression, war and slavery, well, “It’ll be different this time.” Good grief, sometimes I just want to screeeeeeammmmmm!!!!!

Maureen Karas
26 July 2009

This is awful enough, but the real crime is we will not be able to purchase private insurance after this abhorent plan begins. This way GOV controls who gets what care and if he/she even gets care. Phase 2 will fold Medicare and Medicaid into this single payer system. Where is the ire of AARP? This is the GOV answer to the retiring Boomers…let them die, save on Soc. Sec. and sieze their assets through the death tax.

Al Van Abbema
27 July 2009

The situation you have described, or something like it is inevitible. It has been decades since elected officials have had the will or the good of the individual at heart. That situation will get worse as the vested interests simply have all the power. Insurance companies, drug companies, the AMA and lawyers are where elected officials look for financing elections. The mind set of the legislature is so entrenched in politics as usual that if one of them actually has a noble purpose he is treated as unworthy dirt. It would take an overwhelming outcry from the populace to even penetrate that thought structure.

Geg
22 September 2009

My take on it, partly ok, partly worried, is that for POOR PEOPLE who jump on a basic plan (either public option or buyer’s pool) they will get something not much different than what they have now. The Insurer will LIMIT expensive health coverage.

For example, six top insurers in CA denied 21% of claims last year. That gives one little choice, esp with “pre-existing” conditions. Where do you turn? For those patients and families, public protest. Despite public protest and company embarrassment, leading in some cases to reversals, several people died, including two teens, due to insurer denial of benefits.

If anything, for BASIC plans, the methods used by the Insurer to deny claims and ration care, rather than being arbitrary and capricious, rather than being based on the “luck” of the ‘adjustors’ in finding some lame excuse to deny care, like an unreported yeast infection treated with OTC meds 10 years prior, the govt will set STANDARD and UNIFORM reasons to ration care, as well as STANDARD and UNIFORM reasons to NOT ration care.

Ruthless, but rational. Conservatives have long opposed unlimited and unrationed care for the poor. How dare they!!! It’s fiscally unsound!!

ON THE OTHER HAND, and this is the big one, moderately WEALTHY and extremely WEALTHY people who can afford fancy plans will ALWAYS be able to pay for their “covers everything” or “covers almost everything” plans, as always. No one will stop them from kicking in cash, if they wish. Affordable health care means all the medical care that YOU CAN AFFORD to pay for. Very conservative.

There will be no downside to being rich. Are you kidding me? The super-rich financed Obama.

Perhaps even better for some rich people, Insurers MAY be barred from capriciously denying claims of moderately wealthy customers, just because they think they can get away with it.

Of course the very very wealthy can simply threaten to sue any Insurer denying care, which would always be understood in advance by the Insurers. Some customers are not worth screwing over. The wealthy people buy Cadillacs (or Lexuses, etc) and they buy Cadillac-quality Insurance for good reasons. They can afford it. They want it.

What I see here so far is nothing as hysterically horrible as opponents claim (perhaps they underestimate the arbitraryness and viciousness of Insurers), but also no massive “liberal dream” giveaway.

Mostly, an expensive giveaway to Insurance Companies, similar to how the Bush Medicare Reform bill was a giant wet kiss to Big Pharma and Big Insurance.

Basically it’s Reaganomics morphing to Obamanomics, including O’s bailouts for Big Banks which is a re-run of Bush Senior’s bailouts for the bankrupted Savings & Loans, post fraud.

Leave a comment

WP_Big_City